Simon Ekpa, a controversial Finland- based advocate for Biafra independence, has stirred up concern with a recent statement following the death of Nigeria’ s Chief of Army Staff, Lieutenant General Taoreed Abiodun Lagbaja.
Ekpa suggested that General Christopher Gwabin Musa, Nigeria’ s Chief of Defence Staff, may be the next high- ranking military official to pass away, allegedly due to the same mysterious illness that reportedly affected Lagbaja.
Ekpa’ s claim centers on what he refers to as ” Biafra spiritual sickness, ” a term he has used to describe the supposed affliction impacting top Nigerian military personnel.
This statement has generated anxiety among some, given Ekpa’ s reputation for provocative remarks and his history of vocal criticism against the Nigerian government. His words have amplified speculation, raising questions about the nature of Lagbaja’ s death and the health of other high- ranking officials.
General Musa, who has previously clashed with Ekpa over security issues in Nigeria’ s southeastern region, has not responded publicly to Ekpa’ s statements. Musa has criticized Ekpa in the past, accusing him of fueling unrest and instability in the South East through his inflammatory broadcasts.
These accusations reflect the ongoing tension between the Nigerian military leadership and separatist voices like Ekpa, who is known for advocating Biafra’ s independence and often speaks against the Nigerian government’ s actions in the region.
Ekpa’ s role as an agitator for Biafran independence has been marked by a steady stream of incendiary comments and actions, particularly through his online platforms.
While he has garnered support from some pro- Biafra followers, others view him as a divisive figure, especially given his approach and the implications of his rhetoric on national stability.
His statements regarding ” Biafra spiritual sickness” have sparked outrage, with many calling his claims baseless and inflammatory.
As the news of his remarks spreads, there is a growing anticipation around whether General Musa or any government official will formally respond. Given their previous disagreements, a response from Musa might address not only Ekpa’ s latest assertions but also underscore the military’ s stance on individuals inciting division and unrest within Nigeria.
The gravity of Ekpa’ s claims has underscored the fragile state of Nigeria’ s unity, highlighting the strained relationship between the government and separatist advocates.
As Nigeria mourns the loss of its Chief of Army Staff, Ekpa’ s statement has added a new layer of complexity to the situation, bringing forward concerns about the impact of his rhetoric on national morale and the security landscape.
Whether Ekpa’ s predictions hold any weight remains to be seen, but his comments have undeniably intensified the discourse surrounding Nigeria’ s military leadership and national stability.